Bank of America faces at trial ex-executive behind whistleblower case

Bank of America faces at trial ex-executive behind whistleblower case

(Reuters) – A former executive at Bank of AmericaCorp’s (BAC.N) Countrywide unit testified Thursday that the mortgage company’s problematic lending practices predated the “Hustle” process for which the bank went on trial this week.

Edward O’Donnell, a former executive vice president at a Countrywide Financial Corp subsidiary, filed a whistleblower lawsuit last year against Bank of America, which bought Countrywide during the financial crisis.

O’Donnell’s lawsuit is the basis of the U.S. Justice Department’s case alleging that Countrywide defrauded mortgage underwriters Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac by selling them mortgages that later defaulted.

O’Donnell, who stands to earn an award if the government wins at trial, was testifying for the government on Thursday, the third day of the trial.

He said he worked at a Countrywide division that handled subprime mortgage loans. When Countrywide tried to move away from that business, a unit of the company making less-risky prime loans was folded into his, he said.

There were instances where loans that unit produced “did not meet our standards and had problems,” he said.

“I saw these instances as problems,” he said. “I wanted greater quality and better control.”

Countrywide later made some changes at his urging, he said.

O’Donnell is expected to continue to testify on Friday about a subsequent Countrywide program called the “High Speed Swim Lane” – also called “HSSL” or “Hustle.” The program, which began in 2007 as mortgage delinquency and default rates were on the rise, circumvented toughening standards at Fannie and Freddie, O’Donnell has said.

The “Hustle” loans caused Fannie and Freddie to suffer a gross loss of $848.2 million and a net loss of $131.2 million on loans that were materially defective, the Justice Department says.

The Justice Department’s case stems from a lawsuit O’Donnell filed under seal in February 2012 under the False Claims Act. The law allows whistleblowers to bring cases on behalf of the government against companies that defraud it.

He worked at Countrywide from 2003 to 2007. In a twist, he today works at Fannie Mae as a vice president of credit risk management, a spokesman for the mortgage giant confirmed.

In his lawsuit, O’Donnell said he frequently objected to the “Hustle” program and sought to take steps that would stop the rapid deterioration in loan quality.

O’Donnell in the lawsuit said his concerns were disregarded and he was marginalized. He “became one often lone voices within the division pointing to the loan quality issues, increase of early payment defaults and growing number of early defaulted loans,” his lawsuit said.

NEW CUSTOMER ACQUISITION GROUP

O’Donnell, who took the stand toward the end of Thursday, only spoke briefly about HSSL, which he will likely discuss most of Friday. But he discussed how another unit of Countrywide called the New Customer Acquisition (NCA) group had problems of its own.

The case is U.S. ex rel. O’Donnell v. Bank of America Corp et al, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 12-01422.

(Reporting by Nate Raymond in New York; editing by Andrew Hay)

 

 

John Marcotte

720-771-9401

Search all Boulder homes for sale 

 

BH4U

U.S. judge rejects BofA mortgage modification class action

U.S. judge rejects BofA mortgage modification class action

 
A sign for a Bank of America office is pictured in Burbank, California August 19, 2011. REUTERS/Fred Prouser

By Jonathan Stempel

(Reuters) – A lawsuit accusing Bank of America Corp (BAC.N) of reneging on promises to help distressed homeowners modify their mortgage loans, and instead driving them into foreclosure, cannot proceed as a class action, a federal judge has ruled.

While expressing sympathy for borrowers facing a “Kafkaesque bureaucracy” and saying their claims “may well be meritorious,” U.S. District Judge Rya Zobel in Boston said the claims were too different to justify allowing a single, nationwide lawsuit.

Wednesday’s decision is a blow for homeowners accusing the second-largest U.S. bank of failing to comply with the Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP), a 2009 federal program that gives incentives to mortgage servicers to encourage loan modifications and help people keep their homes.

It also marks the latest fallout from a 2011 U.S. Supreme Court ruling involving Wal-Mart Stores Inc (WMT.N) that has made it harder to sue companies as a group. Class actions can lead to larger recoveries and more far-reaching remedies at lower cost.

“It’s a sad outcome for many thousands of homeowners trying to obtain loan modifications,” said Gary Klein, a partner at Klein Kavanagh Costello, representing the plaintiffs. “Very, very few of them will be able to pursue these issues on their own. Their one hope for justice was through the class mechanism.”

Forty-three individuals and couples from 26 U.S. states accused Bank of America in the three-year-old lawsuit of failing to help them obtain loan modifications to which they were entitled. They had sought to certify 26 classes, one per state.

‘VAST FRUSTRATION’ OF HOMEOWNERS

The case gained notoriety in June when several former employees, in sworn statements the bank called “demonstrably false,” accused the bank of offering $500 bonuses and gift cards to TargetCorp (TGT.N) and Bed Bath & Beyond Inc (BBBY.O) to lie and to stall HAMP applications, because foreclosures or in-house loan modifications were more profitable.

One former employee also said the bank would twice a month conduct a “blitz” to clear out hundreds of files from its HAMP backlog solely because the documents were more than 60 days old, even if all required documents were submitted. Bank of America said “blitzes” were used to find documentation for applications.

“This case demonstrates the vast frustration that many Americans have felt over the mismanagement of the HAMP modification process,” Zobel wrote. “Plaintiffs have plausibly alleged that Bank of America utterly failed to administer its HAMP modifications in a timely and efficient way; that in many cases it lost documents, or pretended it had not received them, or arbitrarily denied permanent modifications.”

Bank of America spokesman Rick Simon said: “We respect the court’s decision. We have successfully completed more HAMP modifications than any other servicer and will continue to improve delivery of this and other programs to support our customers in need of assistance.”

 

(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Additional reporting by Dena Aubin and Peter Rudegeair; editing by Gerald E. McCormick and Matthew Lewis)

 

John Marcotte

720-771-9401

Search all Boulder homes for sale 

 

BH4U

Bank of America expects civil charges over mortgage bonds

Bank of America expects civil charges over mortgage bonds

 
The logo of the Bank of America is pictured atop the Bank of America building in downtown Los Angeles November 17, 2011. REUTERS/Fred Prouser

 

The Justice Department intends to file civil charges against Bank of America Corp (BAC.N) linked to a sale of one or two mortgage bonds, the bank said on Thursday in a regulatory filing.

The Securities and Exchange Commission may also file civil charges for one of those bonds, the bank said. Both cases relate to mortgages that were too big to be guaranteed by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, but were packaged into “jumbo” mortgage bonds.

The filing did not specify what the cases were about. A Bank of America spokesman did not immediately return a call seeking comment.

The new charges, disclosed in a quarterly filing, underscore the extent of the second-largest U.S. bank’s hangover from the financial crisis. Bank of America has announced a series of settlements with investors and the U.S. government, including an $8.5 billion settlement with investors in mortgage-backed securities and a $1.6 billion deal with bond insurer MBIA Inc (MBI.N).

Staff at the New York Attorney General’s office said they intend to recommend filing an action against the bank’s Merrill Lynch unit from their mortgage bond investigation, the bank said in the filing.

The SEC is also considering civil charges against Merrill Lynch linked to repackaged debt securities known as collateralized debt obligations, the filing said.

Many of Bank of America’s headaches, including the $8.5 billion settlement, arise from its disastrous 2008 acquisition of Countrywide Financial Corp, a mortgage lender it bought at the height of the housing crisis for $2.5 billion. Analysts estimate the bank has lost more than $40 billion from bad loans, litigation and settlements linked to the purchase.

(Reporting by Dan Wilchins in New York; Editing by Peter Rudegeair and Lisa Shumaker)

 

John Marcotte

720-771-9401

Search all Boulder homes for sale 

 

BH4U

Regulators move forward on foreclosure relief

Regulators move forward on foreclosure relief

A lock secures a chain on the steel fence of a foreclosed home previously owned by U.S. Bancorp in Los Angeles, California July 17, 2012. REUTERS/Mario Anzuoni

By Aruna Viswanatha

(Reuters) – Borrowers whose homes were foreclosed on during the U.S. housing crisis will start receiving payments in April from a $3.6 billion fund under a previously announced settlement with 13 banks, regulators said on Thursday.

Certain borrowers whose mortgages were serviced by one of the 13 banks can expect to receive between a few hundred dollars and $125,000, under settlements designed to end case-by-case reviews of past foreclosures.

The Office of the Comptroller Currency and the Federal Reserve in 2011 ordered banks including Bank of America Corp, JPMorgan Chase & Co, and Wells Fargo to review individual loan files after widespread mistakes were discovered in the way mortgage servicers had processed home seizures.

The reviews were initially expected to determine which borrowers were harmed and to compensate them based on their individual experiences. The process proved slow and expensive, though, with more than $1.5 billion going to consultants.

In January regulators replaced the reviews with about $9.3 billion in settlements, including $3.6 billion in cash payments to foreclosed borrowers. Struggling borrowers will receive the rest of the money in the form of assistance, including loan modifications and forgiveness.

By the end of March, regulators will provide information about the payments to borrowers who fall into one of 11 categories, including those eligible for protections under the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, those who were not in default when foreclosed on, and those denied a loan modification, the OCC said.

Regulators are still determining how many borrowers fall into each category, OCC Deputy Comptroller Morris Morgan said on a conference call with reporters. Once they have that figure, they can calculate how much money each borrower is likely to receive, he said.

DECLINING ERROR RATE

The OCC and the Fed have faced criticism from Congress over both the reviews and the settlement that ended them. Lawmakers have asked for more information about the consultants who conducted the reviews and what they turned up.

Regulators initially said about 6.5 percent of the loans reviewed appeared to have some errors. On Thursday Morgan said that error rate had declined, but did not provide a specific figure.

The banks are expected to try to keep borrowers in their homes, but the settlement does not mandate specific kinds of relief.

The servicers will receive varying degrees of credit for modifying first and second loans, waiving deficiency judgments, offering short sales, and other types of relief.

Three servicers subject to the original reviews, Everbank, OneWest and GMAC Mortgage, did not enter into the settlements and will continue their reviews, the OCC said.

(Reporting by Aruna Viswanatha; Editing by Gerald E. McCormick and Lisa Von Ahn)

 

John Marcotte

720-771-9401

Search all Boulder CO homes for sale